Archive for » March, 2012 «

Evelyn Waugh Book Review by Paul Johnson

For all of you Evelyn Waugh lovers out there.  I have dug up a little something to whet your appetites.  It is a sort of historical book review by Paul Johnson of A Handful of Dust.

Here’s a preview (and coincidently my very favorite part):

Waugh’s gifts as a storyteller are now so obvious to us, and fit so well into his overwhelming personality, that it is impossible to think of him as anything else. But he might not have become a novelist at all. He came down from Oxford having acquired expensive tastes in cigars, wine, travel and rich company, and for many years his main concern was how to earn enough to indulge them.

As his father was a publisher and his elder brother an established author of fiction, writing was clearly the family trade. But this might have operated strongly against taking it up, had cash been easily come by in other ways. He was drawn more to the visual arts than to writing, and illustrated several of his earlier books. What he respected was craftsmanship, and his happiest days, he later said, were spent learning to be a carpenter. Indeed the aspect of writing which appealed most to him, all his life, was the choice and manipulation of words, and the carving of sentences and paragraphs.

As things stood, an unqualified young man with a poor degree had little alternative but to take up schoolmastering in one of the private prep schools which then proliferated. This Waugh did for three years, the unhappiest in his life, which included an unsuccessful suicide bid. For someone with his destructive, anarchic and ruthless sense of humour, teaching on the slippery bottom rung of the educational ladder was an opportunity to acquire grisly material for fictional use.

To read the whole thing CLICK HERE (it’s not very long)

-PB

Andrew Lytle on Kristin Lavransdatter

I recently discovered that the last thing Andrew Lytle published before he died at the ripe ol’ age of 92 was a book entitled Kristin: A Reading by Andrew Lytle.  Naturally, he’s referring to the heroine of the medieval Norwegian saga: Kristin Lavransdatter.   This is exciting on several levels—mainly that Kristin seems to be Lytle’s favorite heroine (though a close tie with Emma Bovary), but also, there really is very little said about this trilogy.  As Curtsinger’s great love for Moby inspired him to publish a reading before his death, we can consider Kristin to be Lytle’s Moby.

If you had Fr. Maguire for American Lit, you can already appreciate this Southern Agrarian as the (courageous) author of “The Hero with the Private Parts”, a collection of literary essays where Lytle analyzes the private and public parts of some of literature’s greatest heroes.  Thomas Carlson, a former student of Lytle’s, writes in the Forward to Kristin that Lytle typically began his courses by telling his students: “Life is melodrama. Only art is real.”   From there, the students learned imaginative writing (Lytle didn’t believe in “creative” writing) through intense courses of reading the greatest works of literature.  Next to War and Peace, Lytle says: “Only one other story, Kristin Lavransdatter, allows the reader to experience so fully the variety and complexities of private and public action”.  Carlson elaborates:

Kristin Lavransdatter is that one special work of literature which in structure, characterization, and action peculiarly stimulates Andrew Lytle’s imagination and sympathy.  In its depiction of rural manners and mores and in its historical milieu, he clearly finds a close connection between the pre-industrial South and medieval Europe. “I know these people.  I grew up with them,” he once told a startled class before discussion of the novel began.

Lytle’s favorite heroines in literature contain what he calls, “a passionate and incorruptible heart”.  It is Kristin’s heart that he is concerned with because he sees it as one with “inordinate passion”, stubborn and disobedient, yet true and unchanging.  This reading is considered to be Lytle’s “most forceful defense of a passionate and incorruptible heart”.

So as not to spoil the saga or Lytle’s interpretation, I will simply reveal what grounds he’s working with and how his reading takes course from there—though I can hardly do it justice.  Kristin grew up in 14th century Norway where religious custom and the State were closely linked.  At this time, the world was not seen as it is today, as Lytle tells:  “Today we take the world as the end of all action, our reward or bane. To the Christians of Norway it was the ground for the drama of the soul, such means we hope to reach the perfectibility of man…”  In Kristin’s household, both the Christian customs and the Law were obeyed.  For Kristin and many people of the time, obedience was habitual.  The danger of obedience, Lytle explains, is that “it never occurred to authority that perpetual unthinking obedience for all would lead to an uninspired life and finally servility to power just or unjust, and in the end possible rebellion and damnation”.  The saga begins with Kristin’s childhood of habitual obedience but she never acquires the virtue on her own.  She is most always concerned with doing her own will, and this, once she “suffers love”,  is detrimental—though possibly sanctifying—to nearly everyone she encounters.  Lytle defends her “passionate and incorruptible heart” as well as that of Brother Edvin (the artist) and her husband Erlend (the Christian Chieftain).

Lytle’s book reads as if a student had recorded him speaking in class and transposed the audio into prose.  It is not a thorough argumentative analysis; it’s more of a meditation on life through the reality of the novel as art.  There are very few great teachers out there and even fewer who have taken the time to publish their profound insights.  Clearly, this publication is a treasure to us as students of life.

I’ll conclude this post as Carlson does his Forward to Kristin: A Reading by quoting a character in one of Lytle’s own novels, The Velvet Horn, who said: “Remember Jack Cropliegh who learned life by heart.  Learning is a surfeit. Let it spill.”

How People Used to Sleep

Surprisingly, people used to sleep differently than we do today. Here’s a link to an article recently published at the BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16964783. The short of it goes that before the advent of artificial lighting, people would go to sleep a couple of hours after the sun went down. They would then wake up in the middle of the night, staying awake for a couple to three hours. They would then fall back asleep for another few hours or so. This is known as bi-modal or segmented sleep. Scientific research has shown that this mode of sleep is natural to all mammals, and that includes us humans.

I have begun to sleep in this manner, and have noticed a considerable change (for the better) in my overall well-being. The catch is that you have to go to sleep early and avoid artificial lighting after the sun goes down, because it particularly interferes with the kicking-in of your natural circadian sleep rhythm. I use oil lamps at night to read by, and have found that the period “in between sleep” is especially good for prayer and study.

I won’t go on, but I encourage you to do a bit of research on the subject. I think it’s a potential game-changer for anyone.

css.php