Blog Archives

St. Greg’s Boys at Wyoming Catholic

Good things coming out of Wyoming from the lads:

…”It was a chance to show the world the importance of joy and the affects joy has on people,” Dalimata said…

…Members of the group [of SGA alumni] have juggled everything from knives to brooms. Yet it’s always that initial shock and wonder on the faces of the audience, no matter the object being thrown in the air, that keeps them wanting to perform….
Read more: https://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming-college-students-spread-faith-through-performing/article_cd6955b7-fc7e-5838-956a-c81bdccbcbce.html#ixzz1s4EUyLwU

Conceptual Humor

Sol Lewitt created some pieces of conceptual art; it all reduced to the idea, and made hands-off installation kind of the fun part. Also, conservation: no problem. Here’s some of these pieces.

You can kind of do the same thing with humor; pick out something commonplace, or already established, which isn’t necessarily funny. And then frame that in terms of something totally different. For example, LINES FROM THE PRINCESS BRIDE THAT DOUBLE AS COMMENTS ON FRESHMAN COMPOSITION PAPERS:

  • “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
  • “At a time like this that’s all you can think to say?”
  • “Nonsense. You’re only saying that because no one ever has.”
  • “I don’t think I’m quite familiar with that phrase.”
  • “I would not say such things if I were you!”
  • “I do not suppose you could speed things up?”
  • “Skip to the end!”
  • “That is the sound of ultimate suffering.”
  • “Inconceivable!”

The funny part is the title. The actual text we’ve heard several times before, but slap on a new title, and it takes on a whole new life.

I dunno, same thing?

P.S. Peter, WTF is that ticker? It’s not 1997 anymore, you know.

The Poet’s Eye – Balancing Universal and Particular

I often think of the act of creating great art as a balancing of universal and particular elements within a work.  The artist must walk a tightrope, to borrow an idea from Juliette Aristides; his balancing act is between two extremes, but in order to keep his balance he must distribute his weight into both extremes (hence tight rope walkers hold the long pole to keep their balance).  They must extend their weight into the extremes, in the case of the artist, he must present his subject in universal and particular terms.  I cannot think of another artist who understands this concept better than Shakespeare.  His character Theseus, speaking to Hippolyta, says that “the lunatic, the lover, and the poet / Are of imagination all compact.”  It is incredible to hear Shakespeare talk of “the poet” in broad terms, and in some removed and qualified way, he seems to be speaking of himself in his own role as poet.  The poet’s act of creation is a stretching out into the realm of heaven and earth (universal and particular):

The poet’s eye, in fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven;
And as imagination bodies forth
The forms of things unknown, the poet’s pen
Turns them to shapes and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.

It is the same of the artist making great works.  He must body forth his imagination, put into some particular form a universal ideal, those two must intermingle and mix together in order to create the greatest art.  There is something immaterial that Shakespeare gets at to, the “airy nothing” must occupy a “local habitation and a name.”

Here is the rest of the speech:

THESEUS
More strange than true: I never may believe
These antique fables, nor these fairy toys.
Lovers and madmen have such seething brains,
Such shaping fantasies, that apprehend
More than cool reason ever comprehends.
The lunatic, the lover and the poet
Are of imagination all compact:
One sees more devils than vast hell can hold,
That is, the madman: the lover, all as frantic,
Sees Helen’s beauty in a brow of Egypt:
The poet’s eye, in fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven;
And as imagination bodies forth
The forms of things unknown, the poet’s pen
Turns them to shapes and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.
Such tricks hath strong imagination,
That if it would but apprehend some joy,
It comprehends some bringer of that joy;
Or in the night, imagining some fear,
How easy is a bush supposed a bear!

css.php