Archive for » February, 2012 «

Austen’s Art of Manners

Hello! This is my first post.

I’m teaching high school English in rural Louisiana, and in order to spark some interest in my seniors as they begin Pride and Prejudice I wrote them a mini, informal essay. We had a wonderful discussion about Southern manners versus Northern (lack of) manners – and I explained to them what it was like for me as a college freshman when I moved to the south for the first time from New England.

They still can’t believe that we don’t say “yes ma’am” or “yes sir” up there.

Here it is:

Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen: The Art of Manners
English IV

The 20th century American Southern writer Flannery O’Connor says:

There are two qualities that make fiction. One is the sense of mystery and the other is the sense of manners. You get the manners from the texture of existence that surrounds you. The great advantage of being a Southern writer is that we don’t have to go anywhere to look for manners; bad or good, we’ve got them in abundance. We in the South live in a society that is rich in contradiction, rich in irony, rich in contrast, and particularly rich in its speech. (Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners)

The type of mind that can understand good fiction is not necessarily the educated mind, but it is at all times the kind of mind that is willing to have its sense of mystery deepened by contact with reality, and its sense of reality deepened by contact with mystery (Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners).

Flannery O’Connor’s description of the relationship between mystery (that which can never be fully understood by the human mind) and manners (our rituals, the acts of courtesy and custom that preserve the mysteries of life) is a wonderful way to begin to understand Jane Austen. Again, “mystery” here does not mean a murder mystery or an area of empirical/physical/scientific reality that we just haven’t figured out yet. “Mystery” for O’Connor (and probably Jane Austen) really means those areas of life and experience that are so deep that we will never (in this life or the next) get to the end of them—such as love, friendship, holiness, suffering, forgiveness, redemption, death, etc. “Manners” definitely includes things like saying “Please” and “thank you,” opening the door for people, dressing appropriately, etc. But “manners” for O’Connor and Austen also includes something more: respecting the privacy of others, understanding and negotiating social boundaries, the art of conversation, the art of listening, etc.

Although Flannery O’Connor wrote in the 20th century American South (Georgia, to be specific) and Jane Austen wrote in the 19th century English countryside, they both are really interested in manners and how manners/social boundaries/customs can either preserve or damage human mystery. For example, good manners for Austen, like waiting to be properly introduced to someone before you talk to them, help people build relationships and friendships based on a solid foundation. Bad manners, on the other hand, like telling your whole life story to someone the first time you meet them, can damage both people involved because one hasn’t established the right foundation yet for that kind of intimacy.

Forgive me for generalizing a little bit, but the Southern states, for some reason, actually seem to pay a lot more attention to manners than the Northern states do, because their priorities are somewhat different. In this way, living in the South might help you appreciate Jane Austen more, since she too would appreciate people saying things like “Yes ma’am” and “Yes sir” and offering people welcome and hospitality.

So:
When you are reading Jane Austen, pay VERY close attention to the manners of the various characters, how they treat one another, judge one another, respond to social situations, etc. Jane Austen is not going to directly describe a lot of emotions to you—but they are definitely there. They are brimming beneath the surface.
It’s like she respects the characters’ interior lives so much that she does not want to completely reveal all of their thoughts and feelings—since that would be a violation of manners and proper boundaries.
At the same time, Austen’s narrator is VERY critical of many of the characters. You may or may not always agree with her.

Don’t be fooled by Austen’s rather cool or lighthearted tone, or her stereotypes, or her ridiculous characters. There is some serious stuff going on underneath all the witty dialogue and brief descriptions.

Good luck!

The Van Dorens

From the indefatigable Kirk Kramer:

Yesterday I discovered that Mark Van Doren’s son Charles is an adjunct
English professor at the Torrington campus of the Univ of Connecticut.  In recent years he has given several lectures
there, sponsored by something called the Litchfield Co. Writers Project.

Here is the link to the list of lectures:

https://www.lib.uconn.edu/lcwp/

Scroll down to “Charles Van Doren: Discussing Mark & Carl Van Doren.
April 29, 2009” for some INTENSELY interesting reminiscences of MVD &
his brother Carl & the whole family.  Maybe the best part is when he
reads & comments on his uncle’s recollections of milking & plowing &
doing the other chores on the family farm at Hope, Illinois.

The lecture with Q&A lasts 90 minutes – at moments one imagines that
John Senior is talking.

—–

N.B. the name of Joseph Wood Krutch in CVD’s remarks.  When I was an
undergrad I came across a book by him & asked Dr Senior about him.  He
said that the friendship between MVD & Krutch was like Jonathan &
David’s.  I believe Dr Senior himself was Krutch’s student.  I found
this item about Krutch on the Columbia website:
https://www.columbia.edu/cu/alumni/Magazine/Summer2000/krutchCultural.html

“And rural mirth and manners are no more” – Watch “FRESH” a powerful documentary about American agriculture

Please visit this link HERE to watch the documentary “Fresh.”  This film takes a look at the deficiencies and horrors of American Industrial Agricultural, but also provides a glimpse of several different organizations or farmers that are working today to create sustainable, philosophically sound, ethical, organic, and natural options for farmers and consumers.  It is only an hour long, but it will make a big difference for you.  In the restoration of Christian Culture Dr. John Senior said of the Industrial Revolution (perfectly applicable to American Industrial Agriculture):

With sweet succession taught e’en toil to please

These round thy bowers their cheerful influence shed,

These were they charms–But all these charms are fled.

Why fled? Because even by Goldsmith’s day unbridled greed, set free from the healthy, cheerful restraints of Christianity, ran toward ruthless Epicureanism which disguised its radical irrationalism under the painted rubric of the Age of Reason, the so-called Enlightenment, in reality a dark  misology which said that reason is the instrument of man and not of truth, and that we are slaves to truthless human systems in the application of reason to the fulfillment of lust in what we call the Industrial Revolution, first wave of the bloody tide of revolutions we haven’t seen the end of yet.  Goldsmith, living up to his name, like the perfect craftsman, fixed his righteous indignation in a couplet:

Ill fares the land, to hast’ning ills a prey,

Where wealth accumulates and men decay:

Princes and lords may flourish or may fade;

A breath can make them, as a breath has made;

But a bold peasantry, their country’s pride,

When once destroyed, can never be supplied.

A time there was, ‘ere England’s griefs began,

When every rood of ground maintained its man;

For him light labour spread the wholesome store,

Just gave what life required, but gave no more;

His best companions, innocence and health;

And his best rices, ignorance of wealth.

But times are alter’d; trade’s unfeeling train

Usurp the land and dispossesss the swain;

Along the lawn, where scattr’d hamlets rose,

Unwieldly wealth, and cumbrous pomp repose;

And every want to opulence allied,

And every pang that folly pays to pride.

Those gentle hours that plenty bade to bloom,

Those calm desires that ask’d but little room,

Those healthful sports that grac’d the peaceful scene,

Liv’d in each look and brighten’d all the green;

These, far departing, seek a kinder shore,

And rural mirth and manners are no more.

After viewing and thinking about “FRESH” I have a few thoughts to share.  One of the chiefest pleasures of “FRESH” was to hear Joel Salatin; he really is a farmer and a philosophical realist: “the chickenness of the chicken,” and its particular way of being really does matter.  I was surprised at how difficult it was for that family Mr. and Mrs. Fox to look at their interviewer…they were utterly ashamed of themselves.  I find it a wonder that nobody seems to know about what is going on in these industrialized feed lots and such.  A thing of beauty pleases the eye: there is order, harmony and proportion in something noble and fine, and thus pleasing to gaze upon, but the feed lots are not fine and noble and are thus not pleasing to look at.  By comparison, Salatin’s family farm is pleasing to behold: there is an order and proportion to things.  Salatin, like a philosopher king, orders the landscape and lives of the animals for their good, and the good of society.

I am going to try to look around Phoenix for a place to buy good food from local farms.  Does anyone know of any good places?

Joel Salatin

“You, as a food buyer, have the distinct privilege of proactively participating in shaping the world your children will inherit.” ― Joel Salatin

css.php